The data center moratorium and what the state will allow
Speakers made a largely environmental and infrastructure case. One resident said data centers employ an average of 30 to 50 full-time workers, that an average facility uses as much electricity as 100,000 homes against a county population of about 104,000, and that a medium facility can use 300,000 gallons of water a day while a large one can use 5 million. Another noted Salisbury's entire daily pumping is roughly 4 to 8 million gallons. Councilman Joe Holloway said staff research showed more than 180 wells went dry during a short 2007 drought. Several speakers pointed to Prince William County, Virginia, and to rising electricity bills.
Planning director Tracy Taylor told council she meets regularly with other Eastern Shore planning directors and that data centers were the main topic at a recent two-hour MACo affiliate meeting. She said a state report is due in September and that MACo has warned counties a complete ban would likely end in litigation. She then walked through a list of state preemptions the county has absorbed: the 2011-12 tier law, which she called a de facto downzoning of the A1 district; solar siting rules that override local regulations and allow up to 5% of the priority preservation area for solar; a requirement to allow manufactured and modular housing by right; a coming accessory dwelling unit provision; and the Housing Certainty Act, which will extend the county's vesting period from three years to five.
Councilman Josh Hastings said he had worked on data center reform for four years and helped put together the state study bill, which the General Assembly passed, the governor vetoed, and the legislature overrode. He said Amazon had pulled its proposed Calvert Cliffs facility that afternoon. He also argued the issue is unavoidable — smartphones, medical records, social media and credit cards all run on data centers — and that because the PJM grid spans 13 states and 67 million people, a facility built in Virginia or New Jersey affects Wicomico electric bills regardless of local zoning.
A Salisbury Planning Commission member raised a point several council members said was new to them: battery energy storage systems attached to data centers, and whether volunteer departments covering most of the county's land area are equipped for lithium-ion fires. Taylor said she would add fire hazard to her list of considerations.
Who sits at the table on fire service
The objections to Legislative Bill 2026-05 were about Section D, which would have let the volunteer fire chiefs' association make recommendations on the Salisbury fire and ambulance budget. Robert Taylor, a county resident, called it "unnecessary and inappropriate" and said the chiefs can already make any suggestion they want, noting that Salisbury handles roughly half of the fire and EMS calls outside the city. Salisbury Council member Melissa Holland asked that the funding-recommendation provision be struck and said accountability should stay with elected officials. Another Salisbury resident said city taxpayers pay twice — city and county — for the same fire service.
Council President John T. Cannon said the bill's purpose was simply to codify recognition of the volunteer chiefs so that future executives and councils must engage them. Councilwoman Shanie Shields said she supports volunteers having a voice to explain their costs but not a vote. Councilman Joe Holloway pressed on why the bill had not gone to a work session, why the Salisbury fire chief was not included, and who had requested the legislation; Cannon said the chiefs had. The Salisbury fire chief, present in the room, said he was not prepared to speak on whether he wanted a seat. Councilman James Winn, participating by Zoom, said he attends the chiefs' meetings, that the chiefs want nothing to do with the Salisbury budget, and that he had presented them the amended legislation and had their support. The underlying city-county fire service agreement remains unsettled; Merritt said he raises it at every meeting.
Nursing home: families and employees describe a facility in decline
This was the longest and most emotional stretch of the night. Speakers asked everyone with a nursing home concern to stand, and most of the gallery did. Two sisters described their mother's care from 2022 until her death in November 2024, and said that on recent visits the familiar staff were gone and employees appeared to be looking over their shoulders. A current nurse, a volunteer, and at least two terminated employees spoke. One terminated employee said seven people representing more than 100 years of combined service had been let go, including one with 18 years, and that she was fired for insubordination over a deadline she said she was never given. A 12.5-year employee said she was told by phone that she was terminated. Employees said the facility's required daily direct-care hours per resident had fallen from a 3.4 standard to 3.0 to 3.2, that billing and MDS coordination are being outsourced, that evening snacks and activities have been cut, and that the facility is rated four stars while surrounding homes are rated two. Several dated the change to April 9 of this year, when a new administrator arrived.
Speakers from the NAACP and the Phi Delta Kappa sorority recounted the home's founding in the 1960s to serve African American residents who had nowhere else to go, and asked who holds fiduciary responsibility for it, how often the council and executive meet with its administrator, and whether it is being privatized. One speaker said the administrator told her that if the county intended to sell, it would not have hired her. A PAC 14 producer said County Executive Julie Giordano stated on video in July that she would not privatize the facility.
Council members said their authority is limited. Holloway said the shift to charter government decades ago moved operational authority to the executive and that the council "can't sit up here and tell you we can fix that problem." Cannon said the executive hired the administrator, that the nursing home is not a county department so the hire did not require council confirmation, that terminations appear to fall under the executive, and that the county attorney will sort out what oversight the council holds in its separate role as the Board of Health. Councilman David Ennis read from a letter by Delegate Sheree Sample-Hughes, highlighting three recommendations: an annual audit, quarterly meetings with the council, and a community-based advisory board including health care professionals, families and council representatives. Shields urged employees to organize collectively and to write to state legislators, the governor and the attorney general.
Vice-President Merritt's statement on "No Queens Wicomico"
In council comment, Vice-President Jeff Merritt read a prepared statement responding to what he described as false accusations that he and the business he formerly co-owned funded or printed signs for a group called No Queens Wicomico. He said he has no involvement, provided no funding, printed nothing, and sold the business in March. He named as accusers the county executive in a recorded interview, a sheriff's deputy operating under what he said was a fake social media profile, and a third person. He said if the rhetoric stops, the matter ends; if it continues, he will bring documentation to each of the seven remaining meetings of the term and pursue legal remedies. He said he did not intend the statement as an attack on the county executive. The transcript contains no response from the executive's office, which was not represented at the podium.